On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Innovimax SARL innovimax@gmail.com wrote:
Lydia,
If I'm not wront the substituion scenario covers your requirements
{{#property:Pxxx}} ==SUBST BY ==>{{#property:Pxxx|label="main label at the time of substitution"}} {{#property:MainLabelAtSubsTime}} ==SUBST BY ==>{{#property:Pxxx|label="main label at the time of substitution"}} {{#property:UnambiuousAliasAtSubsTime}} ==SUBST BY ==>{{#property:Pxxx|label="unambiguous alias at subst time"}} {{#property:AmbiuousAliasAtSubsTime}} ==SUBST BY ==>{{ERROR}} ==> hence the editor can fix it
It looks like covering most of cases without adding extra burden of unicity and keeping existing mechanism
I think the comment part is rather ugly and I'd expect more confusing for editors than it helps tbh. And substituting without the comment would help the first editor but none of the ones after him/her. So I'm not convinced this is a solution :/
Cheers Lydia