Yes that was one of the issues raised in this paper:
"There is no money in Linked Data" Prateek Jain, Pascal Hitzler, Krzysztof Janowicz, Chitra Venkatramani => http://knoesis.wright.edu/pascal/pub/nomoneylod.pdf
-Nicolas.
On 6/17/13 3:08 PM, "Barry Norton" barry.norton@ontotext.com wrote:
One can't license something for which one does/can not have the copyright.
Barry
On 17/06/13 23:03, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Tom Morris, 15/06/2013 14:11:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
For a closer integration with MusicBrainz, they'd probably have to change their (non)licenses. <https://en.wikipedia.org/__wiki/MusicBrainz#Licensing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicBrainz#Licensing> (They seem to claim they're free content, but they aren't.)
The core MusicBrainz facts (artists, albums, tracks) are in the public domain. It's the extra stuff like user generated comments, ratings, etc that they license.
Yes, but their licensing scheme is not very clear and PD is not a license.
Nemo
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l