Am 29.11.18 um 01:00 schrieb Lydia Pintscher:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 9:46 AM Andra Waagmeester andra@micel.io wrote:
I fully agree. I rather see the scarse development resources being focused on fixing this, than the p/q business, as you nicely call it. Tbh, I really don't see an issue with multiple p's and q's over different Wikibases. That is where prefixes are for, to distinguish between different resources. Examples of identical identifier (literal) schemes between multiple resources are abundant. (e.g. PubMed and NCBI gene) It really is a matter of getting used to, or am I missing something?
Are we talking about https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T194180? I'm happy to push that into one of the next sprints if so.
This doesn't fix the hard-coded prefix in the RDF output generated by Wikibase.