I am looking into people buried at some cemeteries and think a dynamic list plus also the list displayed on a map would be interesting
Today I have seen: A) Static lists of people examples A-1) Holy_Cross_Cemetery_(Colma,_California)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Cross_Cemetery_(Colma,_California) A-2) Norra_begravningsplatsenhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norra_begravningsplatsen and in Swedishhttps://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norra_begravningsplatsen#K.C3.A4nda_begravda_personer_i_urval
Those list could rather easy be created using a Query ?person wdt:P119 wd:Q8509540;
What also would be interesting
B) Get the cemetery displayed on a map with graves using B-1) P119https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P119 place of burial pq:P965https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P965 burial plot reference pq:P625https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P625 coordinate location B-2) In the map also see my current location so that I can find what grave is next to me….
Example of map queries:
Holy Cross Cemetery http://tinyurl.com/gm7xx5p
Norra Begravningsplatsen https://goo.gl/isUieGhttps://goo.gl/gSbyPN
[cid:E5DADFE6-FFDE-4F58-946F-8353AF689571@zyxel.com]
Also Displaying A list with Gravestones in a ImageGrid could be of interest
Example of Picture of Graves using ImageGrid http://tinyurl.com/zdyk5nr
Regards Magnus Sälgö Sweden
On 05 Sep 2016, at 11:42, Jan Dittrich <jan.dittrich@wikimedia.demailto:jan.dittrich@wikimedia.de> wrote:
Hi Gerard (and everyone interested in list generation)
Dynamic lists are an interesting point since currently most (manually generated) Lists of Wikipedia are static. I would love to hear more about the issues and workflows around dynamic lists to understand their use better. Some things that are on my mind:
- What are things that a dynamic lists helps you with? (do you have some real-life examples?) - Where might a static list be a better approach? (do you have some real-life examples?) - What are current workflows with Listeria? I think I remember that people in our interviews (thanks to everyone who participated!) mentioned that the generation process currently needs to be triggered manually. Is that just because there is no automatic way or does it provide you with advantages, too?
If there are any other things that might help us to understand your needs better, please share, ideally with an example (in my experience, this makes it much easier to understand the workflow, motivation and it’s context)
Jan
Message: 6 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:18:13 +0200 From: Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.commailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." <wikidata@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org> Subject: Re: [Wikidata] List generation input Message-ID: <CAO53wxWaQ2vyVwg5f94X3G0E3T91gFAuA27uzCYo793RXApEBQ@mail.gmail.commailto:CAO53wxWaQ2vyVwg5f94X3G0E3T91gFAuA27uzCYo793RXApEBQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hoi, I learned that for writing about gender issues the list generated by Listeria are used. The big advantage is that these lists are not fixed. Regularly people write new articles about women and consequently these lists change.
It is this functionality that is really needed and I do not get from the lists examples that need such regular updates. Thanks, GerardM _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
