FWIW, checked again. Neither game can merge two items that link to each other. So, if the protein is "expressed by" the gene, that pair will not even be suggested.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:19 AM Finn Årup Nielsen fn@imm.dtu.dk wrote:
Isn't Magnus Manske's game tagging the edit with "Widar"? I do not see that for, for instance, the user Hê de tekhnê makrê.
I must say, being a wannabe bioinformatician, that the gene/protein data in Wikidata can be confusing. Take https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q14907009 which had a merging problem (that I have tried to resolve).
Even before merging https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q14907009&oldid=261061025 this human gene had three gene products "cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A", "P14ARF" (which to me looked like a gene symbol, I changed it to p14ARF), and "Tumor suppressor ARF". One of them is a mouse protein. One of the others link to http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q8N726 Here the recommended name is "Tumor suppressor ARF" while alternative names are "Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A" and "p14ARF". To me it seems that one gene codes two proteins that can be referred to by the same name.
I hope my edits haven't made more damage than good. Several P1889s would be nice.
I think, as someone suggested, that adding P1889 and having Wikibase merging looking at P1889 would be a solution.
/Finn
On 11/10/2015 12:34 AM, Benjamin Good wrote:
Magnus,
We are seeing more and more of these problematic merges. See: http://tinyurl.com/ovutz5x for the current list of (today 61) problems. Are these coming from the wikidata game?
All of the editors performing the merges seem to be new and the edit patterns seem to match the game. I thought the edits were tagged with a statement about them coming from the game, but I don't see that? If they are, could you just take genes and proteins out of the 'potential merge' queue ? I'm guessing that their frequently very similar names are putting many of them into the list.
We are starting to work on a bot to combat this, but would like to stop the main source of the damage if its possible to detect it. This is , making Wikipedia integration more challenging than it already is...
thanks -Ben
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske@googlemail.com mailto:magnusmanske@googlemail.com>
wrote:
I fear my games may contribute to both problems (merging two items, and adding a sitelink to the wrong item). Both are facilitated by identical names/aliases, and sometimes it's hard to tell that a pair is meant to be different, especially if you don't know about the intricate structures of the respective knowledge domain. An item-specific, but somewhat heavy-handed approach would be to prevent merging of any two items where at least one has P1889, no matter what it specifically points to. At least, give a warning that an item is "merge-protected", and require an additional override for the merge. If that is acceptable, it would be easy for me to filter all items with P1889, from the merge game at least. On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:50 PM Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/28/2015 12:08 PM, Tom Morris wrote: [...] > Going back to Ben's original problem, one tool that Freebase used to help > manage the problem of incompatible type merges was a set of curated sets of > incompatible types [5] which was used by the merge tools to warn users that > the merge they were proposing probably wasn't a good idea. People could > ignore the warning in the Freebase implementation, but Wikidata could make it > a hard restriction or just a warning. > > Tom I think that this idea is a good one. The incompatibility information could be added to classes in the form of "this class is disjoint from that other class". Tools would then be able to look for this information and produce warnings or even have stronger reactions to proposed merging. I'm not sure that using P1889 "different from" is going to be adequate. What links would be needed? Just between a gene and its protein? That wouldn't catch merging a gene and a related protein. Between all genes and all proteins? It seems to me that this is better handled at the class level. peter _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
-- Finn Årup Nielsen http://people.compute.dtu.dk/faan/
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata