On 29.05.2012 18:58, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
Would it not be error prone to have the item setting being inherited in a subtemplate, which, on its own, expects to refer to the default item?
Well, conceptually, I'd say that a template works on whatever was the default item for the caller - that's actually consistent, not breaking any assumptions. It would be more confusing to have it otherwise, imho.
But as Gabriel points out, this is nasty to implement, because it constitutes "context" apart from the actual parameters.
-- daniel