Am 28.05.2014 11:44, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
This one point requires a tiny remark: there is no problem in OWL or RDF to use the same URI as a property, an individual, and a class in different contexts. The only thing that OWL (DL) forbids is to use one property for literal values (like string) and for object values (like other items), but this would not occur in our case anyway since we have clearly defined types. I completely agree with all the rest :-)
Yea, I didn't mean to say that there is an issue with representing this in RDF, but with mapping to RDF vocabularies. Having a relatively limited and stable set of properties to map makes that a lot easier.
-- daniel