Dear André,
Great work you have done.
I am wondering whether you are aware of the issues around the Danish dataset and the clean up apparently required.
As far as I can determine the German Wikipedia has had a number of articles on Danish dolmens and they are also available on Wikidata. As far as I can see these items have not been linked with the new Swedish additions.
For instance, "Dolmen von Tornby" https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1269335 has no Danish ID but is probably one of these items: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30240926 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30240928 or https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30114892 or https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30114893 which the Alicia bot has added.
There are quite a lot of Danish dolmens on the German Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:Gro%C3%9Fsteingrab_in_D%C3%A4nemark
I am sorry to present you with yet another problem. Perhaps the items can be matched by the geo-coordinate.
best regards Finn
On 08/04/2017 04:57 PM, André Costa wrote:
Hi all!
As part of the Connected Open Heritage project Wikimedia Sverige have been migrating Wiki Loves Monuments datasets from Wikipedias to Wikidata.
In the course of doing this we keep a note of the data which we fail to migrate. For each of these left-over bits we know which item and which property it belongs to as well as the source field and language from the Wikipedia list. An example would e.g. be a "type of building" field where we could not match the text to an item on Wikidata but know that the target property is P31.
We have created dumps of these (such as https://tools.wmflabs.org/coh/_total_se-ship_new.json, don't worry this one is tiny) but are now looking for an easy way for users to consume them.
Does anyone know of a tool which could do this today? The Wikidata game only allows (AFAIK) for yes/no/skip whereas you would here want something like <enter_value>/invalid/skip. And if not are there any tools which with a bit of forking could be made to do it?
We have only published a few dumps but there are more to come. I would also imagine that this, or a similar, format could be useful for other imports/template harvests where some fields are more easily handled by humans.
Any thoughts and suggestions are welcome. Cheers, André André Costa |Senior Developer, Wikimedia Sverige |Andre.Costa@wikimedia.se mailto:Andre.Costa@wikimedia.se |+46 (0)733-964574
Stöd fri kunskap, bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige. Läs mer på blimedlem.wikimedia.se http://blimedlem.wikimedia.se/
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata