Hoi, It is highly likely that your Lombard duke already existed. So I think you got it wrong. Thanks, GerardM
On 27 November 2015 at 19:31, Dario Taraborelli dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org wrote:
Gerard – I think you’re missing my point. I’m not suggesting this as a display feature (which would be welcome and can always be generated by any tool querying Wikidata labels) but as a contribution *stored* to avoid future errors.
On Nov 27, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, Why not use Reasonator? https://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?find=Grasulfo Thanks, GerardM
On 27 November 2015 at 19:26, Dario Taraborelli < dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Magnus, this is fantastic and works as expected, thanks a lot.
One last note regarding the use of *different from* (P1889 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1889). While I agree with you that it would be overkill to generate all these relations for common homonyms, for new items created by Mix’n’match with the above tweak, where a single other notable individual was previously missing from Wikidata (and when no matching label can be found), it would be tremendously useful to automatically add a two-way relation (see for example *Grasulfo* ( Q3775839 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3775839) <—> *different from* ( P1889 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1889) <—> *Grasulfo *( Q21571734 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21571734). Having this property added would save me 2 extra edits and permanently store disambiguation signal for future reference.
Thoughts?
On Nov 24, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Luca Martinelli martinelliluca@gmail.com wrote:
<3
L. Il 23/nov/2015 21:05, "Magnus Manske" magnusmanske@googlemail.com ha scritto:
Done.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:25 PM Asaf Bartov abartov@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Dario Taraborelli < dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Nov 21, 2015, at 10:31, Magnus Manske magnusmanske@googlemail.com wrote:
A soultion could be to change the "not on Wikidata" button (or link) to
a "create new item" button. The new item would have a label, a description (maybe), a statement with the catalog ID (if there is an associated WIkidata property!), and "instance of:human" if the entry is internally marked as "person", but nothing else.
Would that be welcomed by "mix'n'matchers", and Wikidata people? I think it would make sense, for catalogs with a Wikidata property at least.
I would strongly support this, with the restrictions you suggest.
+1. This would be good.
A.
-- Asaf Bartov Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org/
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! https://donate.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
*Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
*Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata