Mmm... I previously added a few chemical identifiers, like KEGG, ChEBI, DrugBank, but I cannot find them anymore... :/
Egon
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Egon Willighagen egon.willighagen@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lydia, all,
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Markus Krötzsch markus@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
On 05.03.2016 14:45, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
Give it another 2 to 3 weeks and it'll get there. More and more editors are exposed to the separation in the UI now and start noticing the ones that intuitively should be moved into the identifier section.
Ok, let's see what happens. I am not saying that the other criteria applied now in the discussions are bad. It's just another use of the datatype than I would have expected.
I'm one of the people who noticed the separation and indeed wondered why some of the chemistry-related identifiers I tagged and added in the long lists of identifiers were not included yet...
What is the exact process? Do you just plan to wait longer to see if anyone supports/contradicts my tagging? Should I get other Wikidata users and contributors to back up my suggestion?
Originally, I though the idea was just to remove/leave/add them in/to the list, but people started making comments now. I will do this more explicitly now. Also for the IDs I added.
Egon
-- E.L. Willighagen Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen