2015-07-04 19:10 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>om>:
Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada, 04/07/2015 14:20:
Being most libraries non-profit and educational
resources, I think that
it is a special case.
Not for the paperwork. Let's avoid throwing unwitting librarians into
crime.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use#paid-contrib-disclosure
You are being a bit picky. And... crime!?
I said "we can ask the community" and my proposal is about _lists_ (list of
items) not articles where "promotional" stuff can be hypothetically
written. Also, what you linked is about paid editing _without disclosure_.
We are talking about this in an open way, and any librarian can disclose it
in his userpage if needed.
Also, here[1] it says:
"There are exceptions to the general advice that editors with a financial
COI refrain from editing affected articles. Benign examples of editors
being paid include Wikipedians collaborating with mission-aligned
organizations such as galleries, libraries, archives and museums
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM>."
Said that, I'm not interested in a wikilaw thread. Bye.
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Paid_editing
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries