Hoi, There is only one ID that truly identifies an object uniquely and, that is the ID of the collection involved. It is an happy occasion when they all match but they will not always match. Storing IDs is not a big problem, in the end we will find that having them leads to harmonisation. Consequently there is no real argument as far as I understand them why we cannot have them all. It has one distinct advantage, we can more easily compare our data with `theirs`.
When we show a given set in a given country, we make an arbitrary distinction. When we make it a preference, it is more complicated but more useful- Thanks, GerardM
On 2 August 2015 at 12:44, Sandra Fauconnier sandra.fauconnier@gmail.com wrote:
As I hinted on project chat: if we create a property for MoMA IDs, we really have to be consistent and create property for all art collections that use persistent IDs and of which we have items on Wikidata. I think we (will) have hundreds of these. Are we OK with that - having hundreds of museum and art collection-specific properties?
Best, Sandra
On 30 Jul 2015, at 17:44, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, Good job ... went there to approve ... but as there is nothing to approve I do. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 July 2015 at 16:27, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 14:52, Magnus Manske magnusmanske@googlemail.com wrote:
Everyone vote for MoMA property creation please ;-)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Authority_control#M...
I took the liberty of speedily creating that - P2014
-- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata