On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
When an external ontology says that something is a
disease and the DSM-5
says it is not. There is a huge problem.
How is DSM-5 not an ontology itself? Why is this a huge problem? Isn't
this just two sources that contradict each other? Moreover, I am even
tempted to say it's not even a formal contradiction; it's just
different definitions of something which is hard to define...
More interestingly would be: should Wikidata have separate items for both?
Egon
--
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (
http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage:
http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn:
http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog:
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList:
http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286
ImpactStory:
https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen