Le 2013-04-08 15:02, Luca Martinelli a écrit :
What I tried to say is: we don't mind if we go
back in a page history
and find a red link to a template, nobody cares, because we all know
that a template has been deleted/substituted *for a reason* - that we
even discussed for a VERY long time. What we DO care is that the
article has *right now* the correct data - and this will be easier
with Wikidata. I wouldn't have been its main sponsor in it.wp, if it
wasn't for this.
When I look in the history, I want to see the data which where used
then : there are the correct data of this history context. The "current"
page may be automaticaly edited to match the current wikidata entries it
refers to, but this changes should appears in the history, just like
it's done with bots.
So, no, I don't care that the last revision of an article uses the
"correct data", because "correct data" is an ambiguous term. What I
hope
to see, is that the last revision article uses the last revision of the
wikidata entries it needs; or at least the value it had the last time
that a commit was made to update this value. And when I look in the
history, I want to see the value that the article used to use then.
Otherwise it would be history counterfeiting.
--
Association Culture-Libre
http://www.culture-libre.org/