Ah, I meant to include links:
International case data
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic_data>
('current', hard to see "as of" date per cell, updated ~1x/day, 250
references)
International case data
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic_data/International_medical_cases>
(daily time series, by country. 350 in-cell references)
US case data
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic_data/United_States_medical_cases>
(daily time series, by state. 670 in-cell references)
Other templates
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic_templates>
(~300
in all, almost all updated independently by hand)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:18 AM Hay (Husky) <huskyr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey SJ,
do you have a specific example that might be useful to look at?
-- Hay
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 4:14 PM Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There are many highly used templates on WP with time-series data about
COVID
spread: cases, tests, health outcomes, by region + per day. Each
cell has a source and some context (caveats, multiple slightly conflicting
or time-offset sources, commentary about that data point), and would
benefit from being explicitly versioned in Wikidata.
What's the right way to capture this in Wikidata - currently, and in the
future? EN Wikipedia tends to have one footnote about sourcing per
geography, with occasional footnotes about how some of those sources have
changed over time. I don't know of any of these templates that are drawing
from Wikidata.
SJ
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
--
Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266