I hate the term "non functional requirement" but most people would pigeonhole this extract problem. It does reach extremes and if a system is at bat enough it will strike out badly some times. Having a sense of what could be offensive is a part of social skills and it is an essential skill for intelligent systems.
Why not "Lister" or "Listerine™?" these are based on the same root and don't trigger quite the same "A=A" reaction that Listeria does.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:34 PM, John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com wrote:
There is no consensus at nowiki on use of this bot, it has not been raised, and the name as such has neither been discussed either. My comment on the name is solely my opinion. I'm not interested in whether it is a pun or not, it has a clear and direct connection to a disease that has killed people and I don't like it.
The bot has other issues, but that is another discussion.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Mathias Schindler < mathias.schindler@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:23 AM, John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com wrote:
Please do not name projects "listeria", or use any other names of
diseases
that has killed people. Thank you for taking this into consideration
next
time.
Hi John,
given that the premise of your email is factually incorrect (as listeria is a pun referring to lists, sharing the name with a family of bacteria named after Joseph Lister (according to Wikipedia)), is there now consensus that the is no issue with this bot name and that the recommendation only applies to picking names in general without any assertion that this wasn't duly taken into consideration this time?
Mathias
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata