Hi Gregor - the root of the misconception I likely have about significant digits and the like, is that such is one example of a rendering parameter not a semantic property. But maybe I've missed the part of the discussion that cleanly separates these things into buckets, and perhaps I have my head way too (deep in the sand) to understand the discussion altogether, but that's my two cents fwiw.
With regard to other relevant worthy efforts, I suggest http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/. [3]
On 19.12.2012 09:47, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
Martynas,
I think you misinterpret the thread.
There is no discussion not to
build on the datatypes defined in
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ [1]
What we are doing is
discussing compositions of elements, all typed to
xml datatypes, that
shall be able to express scientific and
engineering requirements as to
statistics, signficant digits (except
perhaps for duration, none of
the data types in
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ [1] supports
that), as well as means to
express uncertainty and confidence
intervals.
Many existing xml schemata define such compositions, all
squarely
built on http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ [1] - wikidata is
certainly not
unique in this effort. If you can point the team to
further well
reviewed solutions, this would be very useful.
Gregor
Wikidata-l
mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l [2]
Links: ------ [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ [2] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/