At the risk of self-promotion, you might find the following useful. We looked at the "coverage" part, and not the "accuracy" part:
Halavais, A. and Lackaff, D. (2008) An Analysis of Topical Coverage of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (2). 429-440.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Adrianne Wadewitz wadewitz@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking at submitting a grant so that I can work on an analyses of en.wikipedia's coverage of art, literature, and history articles - their accuracy, etc. I am looking to establish a complete bibliography of all of the "quality" assessments that have been done about Wikipedia - on any language. Could we pool our knowledge?
Thanks!
Adrianne
-- Adrianne Wadewitz Teaching Fellow English department Indiana University
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l