At the risk of self-promotion, you might find the following useful. We
looked at the "coverage" part, and not the "accuracy" part:
Halavais, A. and Lackaff, D. (2008) An Analysis of Topical Coverage of
Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (2).
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Adrianne Wadewitz <wadewitz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am looking at submitting a grant so that I can work
on an analyses
of en.wikipedia's coverage of art, literature, and history articles -
their accuracy, etc. I am looking to establish a complete bibliography
of all of the "quality" assessments that have been done about
Wikipedia - on any language. Could we pool our knowledge?
Wiki-research-l mailing list
// This email is
// [x] assumed public and may be blogged / forwarded.
// [ ] assumed to be private, please ask before redistributing.
// Alexander C. Halavais, ciberflâneur