Kerry,
Here are a couple recent pieces on predicting conversation outcomes, that I'm aware of.
1. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.05345.pdf 2. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/I17-1103
There's another recent one about predicting whether RFCs will be closed, that Chris Schilling worked on with some folks from MIT. That's been accepted to a conference, but not officially published yet--so I don't *think* Mako would have mentioned it at Wikimania?
Hope that helps, J
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org wrote:
Maybe it was this research ? https://blog.wikimedia.org/201 8/06/13/conversations-gone-awry/
Or perhaps you were recalling the talk page research summarized in this year's "State of Wikimedia Research" https://wikimania2018.wikimedia.org/wiki/Program/ State_of_Wikimedia_Research_2017-2018 Wikimania presentation? https://mako.cc/talks/201807- wikimania_research.pdf
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Kerry Raymond kerry.raymond@gmail.com wrote:
Some time in the last few months (possibly at Wikimania) someone pointed
me
at some research about predicting the outcome of Wikipedia consensus building from the language they were using in Talk. I think it was either research in progress or recently completed.
As I recall, the main "take home" message was that discussions where
"you"
started to be used tended to end up in conflict and that discussions that avoided "you" were more likely to resolve amicably.
If this rings any bells for you, can you please point me at it please.
Thanks
Kerry
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l