This doesn't answer your question directly, but it provides a temporal view
into quality control tools:
https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~halfaker/publications/When_the_Levee_Breaks/g…
TL;DR: ClueBot NG reverts vandalism within 5 seconds, people using Huggle
review within ~30s, and people reverting manually take minutes to days to
remove damage.
Also, we can see that when ClueBot NG is down, the median time to reversion
goes up substantially.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:19 AM Haifeng Zhang <haifeng1(a)andrew.cmu.edu>
wrote:
Hi all,
This might be a known fact already.
Does it take less time (on average) for an editor to identify a
vandalistic edit when using counter-vandalism tools, e.g., Huggle or STiki?
If so, what features of these tools support such decision?
Thanks for your time,
Haifeng Zhang
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l