I don't think the "no original research" rule would apply to a research
journal that was hosted/sponsored/whatever by WMF. It's a reasonable rule for
Wikipedia as an encyclopaedia but I don't think anyone (that mattered) would think it
should apply to a research journal about Wikipedia, WMF, etc.
Should we be thinking of this journal as a new WMF project (a stablemate to Wikipedia,
Wikiversity, etc)?
Kerry