Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social
science research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have
these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others
think...
Best,
Heather.
Heather Ford
Oxford Internet Institute <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk> Doctoral Programme
EthnographyMatters <http://ethnographymatters.net> | Oxford Digital
Ethnography Group <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=115>
| @hfordsa <http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa>
On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Max,
yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
reading your summary!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <kleinm(a)oclc.org> wrote:
Dario, what's the timeframe for writing
reviews so they can get into the
signpost in time. 25th?
Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
+17074787023
________________________________________
From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org <
wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario
Taraborelli <dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
an
interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
content and communities
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research
newsletter: new papers open
for review
Hi everybody,
with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
have a good
set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
Newsletter [1]
add your
name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
experimenting
with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l
and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process
feel free to get in touch off-list.
Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l