Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
Best, Heather.
Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk Doctoral Programme EthnographyMatters http://ethnographymatters.net | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=115 http://hblog.org | @hfordsa http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa
On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Max,
yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to reading your summary!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max kleinm@oclc.org wrote:
Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the
signpost in time. 25th?
Maximilian Klein Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC +17074787023
From: wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org <
wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
for review
Hi everybody,
with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1]
Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list.
Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l