Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer
names/usernames
to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting
some
very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily
(although
I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social
science
research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
Best,
Heather.
Heather Ford
Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
| @hfordsa
On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Max,
yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
reading your summary!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <kleinm(a)oclc.org> wrote:
> Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into
> the
> signpost in time. 25th?
>
> Maximilian Klein
> Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
> +17074787023
>
> ________________________________________
> From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> <wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario
> Taraborelli
> <dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
> To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who
> has
> an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into
> Wikimedia
> content and communities
> Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers
> open
> for review
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up
> we
> have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the
> Research
> Newsletter [1]
>
> Please take a look at:
https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
> add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As
> usual,
> short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>
> Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
> experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to
> analytics-l and
> wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process
> feel
> free to get in touch off-list.
>
> Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
>
> [1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org