Hi, Thanks Maarten. Sorry - I ought to clarify - as it says in the post, I know about the GLAMwiki toolset and we're planning to use it here at YMT for a massive upload of PD art. However there are lots of smaller uploads of images produced by volunteers and adding Commons to their workflow keeps them engaged in the material. But they don't have the technical capacity to use the toolset. Thoughts anyone? Cheers, Pat On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Maarten Zeinstra &lt;mz(a)kl.nl&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > Actually this project is reaching it final stages: > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GLAMwiki_Toolset_Project > > I participated in that project at an earlier stage, I think you would > need to contact someone on that page other than me to see if the tool > can > be useful for you. > > Cheers, > > Maarten Zeinstra > > -- > Kennisland > | www.kennisland.nl | t +31205756720 | m +31643053919 | @mzeinstra > > On 28 Jan 2014 at 18:06:35 , Pat Hadley > (pat@pathadley.net<//pat@pathadley.net>) > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I may well be being dense with this question but after a fair bit of > searching I posted about the possibility of a tweaked Commons Upload > Wizard for GLAM > users<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_Wizard_feedback#… > > Specifically, hoping for an alternative to the Information Template. > > I've had no response as yet and wondered whether it was an issue other > GLAMmers had already tackled and that I was merely having a search > fail? > > Cheers and best, > > Pat > > -- > Pat Hadley > cultural sector brain-for-hire > pathadley.net > @pathadley <http://twitter.com/pathadley> > _______________________________________________ > GLAM mailing list > GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam > > -- Pat Hadley cultural sector brain-for-hire pathadley.net @pathadley <http://twitter.com/pathadley>