Sweet. They look to be encouraging use which is really great too
Sydney
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 13, 2013, at 6:51 AM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome.
A lot of us have spent time with them - and James. He came to the OpenGLAM US professional development event.
This is awesome! Woot!
Sarah
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 13, 2013, at 3:37 AM, Lori Phillips lori.byrd.phillips@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I was very excited to see this blog post come out of the Getty today, from CEO James Cuno, who is both a polarizing and respected force in the museum world. In the U.S. we've been trying to encourage the Getty to release their Vocabularies into the public domain for years. In my last effort, I had the Dallas Museum of Art's Rob Stein tell me he would be sure to "strongly encourage" this as soon as he could, because there was really no reason why it shouldn't be. So that is a great win for us, in addition to the fact that the Getty is a new proponent and advocate for open culture in general.
http://blogs.getty.edu/iris/open-content-an-idea-whose-time-has-come/
I'm also personally quite proud that the recent Horizon Report: Museum Edition was cited as his rationale, thanks to the fact that Open Content was included as a near-term horizon in the 2012 report. We worked hard to get that included this year, since Open Content has been on the bubble in past Horizon Reports. It's also exciting to see the Walters listed first among Cuno's listing of forward thinking institutions in the US who have paved the way for open culture.
This blog should prove useful for those still needing convincing - enjoy!
Lori
-- Lori Byrd Phillips Digital Marketing Content Coordinator The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
703.489.6036 | http://loribyrdphillips.com/ _______________________________________________ GLAM-US mailing list GLAM-US@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us
GLAM-US mailing list GLAM-US@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us
This is genuinely exciting and quite a forceful statement from them - all the while recognising that the times and best practices have changed and that they should too.
I tested the system a bit.... I chose one of the PD works and clicked download: http://search.getty.edu/museum/records/musobject?objectid=305961 It gives you a useful caption and metadata and asks what kind of person you are or organisation you represent, and then asks what kind of usage you will make of the image. For the purposes of my experiment I chose "for profit company" and "commercial use", clicked submit and.... it downloaded straight away. No extra hurdles or warnings or requirements to pay etc. I suspect that the two questions are more about their interest in seeing how the files end up getting used - and that is a very fair thing for them to want to try and get stats on.
Fantastic!
wittylama.com Peace, love & metadata
On 13 August 2013 12:07, Sydney sydney.poore@gmail.com wrote:
Sweet. They look to be encouraging use which is really great too
Sydney
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 13, 2013, at 6:51 AM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome.
A lot of us have spent time with them - and James. He came to the OpenGLAM US professional development event.
This is awesome! Woot!
Sarah
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 13, 2013, at 3:37 AM, Lori Phillips lori.byrd.phillips@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I was very excited to see this blog post come out of the Getty today, from CEO James Cuno, who is both a polarizing and respected force in the museum world. In the U.S. we've been trying to encourage the Getty to release their Vocabularies into the public domain for years. In my last effort, I had the Dallas Museum of Art's Rob Stein tell me he would be sure to "strongly encourage" this as soon as he could, because there was really no reason why it shouldn't be. So that is a great win for us, in addition to the fact that the Getty is a new proponent and advocate for open culture in general.
http://blogs.getty.edu/iris/open-content-an-idea-whose-time-has-come/
I'm also personally quite proud that the recent Horizon Report: Museum Edition was cited as his rationale, thanks to the fact that Open Content was included as a near-term horizon in the 2012 report. We worked hard to get that included this year, since Open Content has been on the bubble in past Horizon Reports. It's also exciting to see the Walters listed first among Cuno's listing of forward thinking institutions in the US who have paved the way for open culture.
This blog should prove useful for those still needing convincing - enjoy!
Lori
-- Lori Byrd Phillips Digital Marketing Content Coordinator The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
703.489.6036 | http://loribyrdphillips.com/
GLAM-US mailing list GLAM-US@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us
GLAM-US mailing list GLAM-US@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us
GLAM mailing list GLAM@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam
Il 13/08/2013 07:36, Liam Wyatt ha scritto:
This is genuinely exciting and quite a forceful statement from them - all the while recognising that the times and best practices have changed and that they should too.
I wonder if there have been any *negative* reactions to this move?
I really find it exciting, even though the number of items is perhaps a tiny amount compared to the actual availability. The wording of the terms is clear and direct, even though one may note that *not* choosing a Creative Commons Attribution license makes it more difficult to have embedded metadata (or not?).
Ciao steko