,
I got 0 views in 2016-01. That seems wrong.
Regards,
Ole
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Magnus Manske
<magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
I checked the API return codes, and the look-ups
return 404, but also a
(rather well-hidden) message that there is no data for that page on that
project. The project works for other pages, so I guess there is no view
data, either because no one viewed the page, or because it got lost in the
mail.
A 404 error just appears to be the API's way of saying "no views". I have
thus deactivated the warning.
(I also moved the page to the correct spelling,
https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/glamorgan.html )
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:05 PM Kerry Raymond <kerry.raymond(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Great tool!
I used it on Category:Queensland Heritage Register and
1,936 files in category tree.
1,748 pages use those files.
2,820,177 file views in 2016-01.
116 pages could not be checked for view data in the pageview API.
But I am curious what the error message about the 116 pages meant?
Kerry
From: GLAM [mailto:glam-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Magnus
Manske
Sent: Tuesday, 23 February 2016 1:25 AM
To: GLAM-L <glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [GLAM] New tool
FYI, I wrote a tool that works similarly to baGLAMa, but you can request
categories on-the-fly:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/glamoran.html
The tool is using the WMF pageview API, and is limited by this (earliest
data is 2015-08).
Also, it works entirely in the browser, so using large category trees are
not recommended.
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam