https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Commit... Is a comment by an Arbitrator about things written last month or so here, none by me, they don't like.
Thinks it's necessary "the moderators get a grip on some of the things being said there." (Moderator comments welcome here for guidance.)
*https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-November/004930.html "a posting about legal repercussions"
*https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-December/005008.html "suggesting doxxing/opposition research"
*https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-December/005068.html "plans" to https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-December/005079.html "block vote at ArbCom elections with new editors recruited at editathons." (actually just a suggestion by an annoyed editor)
Hopefully they aren't proposing a standard tougher than than on all the other mailing lists, none of which I personally belong to.
CM
Hopefully they aren't proposing a standard tougher than than on all the other mailing lists, none of which I personally belong to.
Oddly enough I've just made that point on-wiki. (Before I'd properly read your email!)
That said I *do* think this list could do with more active moderation. (The same is true of many other lists but I think this list when working well has higher value, and because it's a smaller, more focused list such moderation is more likely to happen).
Chris
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap