FYI - and be sure to take the survey, please! It's all anonymous - it's a great idea to check your preferred gender if you so desire. This is the survey that gives us the gender gap percentage in Wikipedia. I'd love to see if the dial has moved at all since the past two years (where it's virtually been approximately 9% over all languages).
Sarah
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Wikimedia-l] 2012 Editor survey launched Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:25:24 -0700 From: Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi all,
we have just launched the Foundation's 2012 editor survey; with invitations to participate being shown to logged-in users on Wikipedia and Commons.
A few quick facts about the survey (for more refer to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editor_Survey_2012 ):
* This is the third survey of editors as envisaged in the Foundation's 2010-15 strategic plan "in order to take the pulse of the community and identify pressing issues or concerns", after the April 2011 and December 2011 surveys.
* The first main purpose of this survey is to continue the work of the 2011 studies (conducted by Mani Pande and Ayush Khanna), with a focus on tracking changes since last year and identifying trends. Which is why many questions are being repeated from last time.
* The second emphasis in this instance of the survey is to measure the satisfaction of the editing community with the work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
* This is the first editor survey that includes a non-Wikipedia project (Commons, for the questions that are non Wikipedia-specific).
* Thanks to everyone who commented on the draft questionnaire after we solicited feedback on this list and in and IRC office hour, as well as to those who commented about the last survey. We made several changes based on the feedback, and tried to reply to all concerns.
* Also many thanks to all volunteer translators who reviewed or contributed translations; the questionnaire is available in 14 languages (Italian, Polish and Portuguese will launch a bit later).
* As with the previous two surveys, the results will be published in the following forms: A "topline" report detailing the percentage of responses for each question, a series of posts on https://blog.wikimedia.org analyzing the results, and a data set consisting of anonymized responses which others can use to do their own analyses. This time we will also aim to produce language-specific topline reports (an approach we already tested for Chinese with the data from the December 2011 survey).
Could I have a link to the survey please? I didn't get a notification for whatever reason.
Keilana
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.comwrote:
FYI - and be sure to take the survey, please! It's all anonymous - it's a great idea to check your preferred gender if you so desire. This is the survey that gives us the gender gap percentage in Wikipedia. I'd love to see if the dial has moved at all since the past two years (where it's virtually been approximately 9% over all languages).
Sarah
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Wikimedia-l] 2012 Editor survey launched Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:25:24 -0700 From: Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org tbayer@wikimedia.org Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi all,
we have just launched the Foundation's 2012 editor survey; with invitations to participate being shown to logged-in users on Wikipedia and Commons.
A few quick facts about the survey (for more refer tohttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editor_Survey_2012 ):
- This is the third survey of editors as envisaged in the Foundation's
2010-15 strategic plan "in order to take the pulse of the community and identify pressing issues or concerns", after the April 2011 and December 2011 surveys.
- The first main purpose of this survey is to continue the work of the
2011 studies (conducted by Mani Pande and Ayush Khanna), with a focus on tracking changes since last year and identifying trends. Which is why many questions are being repeated from last time.
- The second emphasis in this instance of the survey is to measure the
satisfaction of the editing community with the work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
- This is the first editor survey that includes a non-Wikipedia
project (Commons, for the questions that are non Wikipedia-specific).
- Thanks to everyone who commented on the draft questionnaire after we
solicited feedback on this list and in and IRC office hour, as well as to those who commented about the last survey. We made several changes based on the feedback, and tried to reply to all concerns.
- Also many thanks to all volunteer translators who reviewed or
contributed translations; the questionnaire is available in 14 languages (Italian, Polish and Portuguese will launch a bit later).
- As with the previous two surveys, the results will be published in
the following forms: A "topline" report detailing the percentage of responses for each question, a series of posts onhttps://blog.wikimedia.org analyzing the results, and a data set consisting of anonymized responses which others can use to do their own analyses. This time we will also aim to produce language-specific topline reports (an approach we already tested for Chinese with the data from the December 2011 survey).
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Wikimedia-l mailing listWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
On 10/30/12 7:08 PM, Keilana Wikipedia wrote:
Could I have a link to the survey please? I didn't get a notification for whatever reason.
I didn't see one either. I'm just assuming it'll pop up eventually. I'll ping Tilman and see what is up!
-Sarah
Keilana
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch@gmail.com mailto:sarah.stierch@gmail.com> wrote:
FYI - and be sure to take the survey, please! It's all anonymous - it's a great idea to check your preferred gender if you so desire. This is the survey that gives us the gender gap percentage in Wikipedia. I'd love to see if the dial has moved at all since the past two years (where it's virtually been approximately 9% over all languages). Sarah -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Wikimedia-l] 2012 Editor survey launched Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:25:24 -0700 From: Tilman Bayer <tbayer@wikimedia.org> <mailto:tbayer@wikimedia.org> Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> <mailto:wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> <mailto:wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Hi all, we have just launched the Foundation's 2012 editor survey; with invitations to participate being shown to logged-in users on Wikipedia and Commons. A few quick facts about the survey (for more refer to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editor_Survey_2012 ): * This is the third survey of editors as envisaged in the Foundation's 2010-15 strategic plan "in order to take the pulse of the community and identify pressing issues or concerns", after the April 2011 and December 2011 surveys. * The first main purpose of this survey is to continue the work of the 2011 studies (conducted by Mani Pande and Ayush Khanna), with a focus on tracking changes since last year and identifying trends. Which is why many questions are being repeated from last time. * The second emphasis in this instance of the survey is to measure the satisfaction of the editing community with the work of the Wikimedia Foundation. * This is the first editor survey that includes a non-Wikipedia project (Commons, for the questions that are non Wikipedia-specific). * Thanks to everyone who commented on the draft questionnaire after we solicited feedback on this list and in and IRC office hour, as well as to those who commented about the last survey. We made several changes based on the feedback, and tried to reply to all concerns. * Also many thanks to all volunteer translators who reviewed or contributed translations; the questionnaire is available in 14 languages (Italian, Polish and Portuguese will launch a bit later). * As with the previous two surveys, the results will be published in the following forms: A "topline" report detailing the percentage of responses for each question, a series of posts on https://blog.wikimedia.org analyzing the results, and a data set consisting of anonymized responses which others can use to do their own analyses. This time we will also aim to produce language-specific topline reports (an approach we already tested for Chinese with the data from the December 2011 survey). -- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Unsubscribe:https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Ah, then they probably haven't quite turned it on. I wasn't in the last two, so at least that's one more woman! :)
Keilana
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.comwrote:
On 10/30/12 7:08 PM, Keilana Wikipedia wrote:
Could I have a link to the survey please? I didn't get a notification for whatever reason.
I didn't see one either. I'm just assuming it'll pop up eventually. I'll ping Tilman and see what is up!
-Sarah
Keilana
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.comwrote:
FYI - and be sure to take the survey, please! It's all anonymous - it's a great idea to check your preferred gender if you so desire. This is the survey that gives us the gender gap percentage in Wikipedia. I'd love to see if the dial has moved at all since the past two years (where it's virtually been approximately 9% over all languages).
Sarah
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Wikimedia-l] 2012 Editor survey launched Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:25:24 -0700 From: Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org tbayer@wikimedia.org Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi all,
we have just launched the Foundation's 2012 editor survey; with invitations to participate being shown to logged-in users on Wikipedia and Commons.
A few quick facts about the survey (for more refer tohttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editor_Survey_2012 ):
- This is the third survey of editors as envisaged in the Foundation's
2010-15 strategic plan "in order to take the pulse of the community and identify pressing issues or concerns", after the April 2011 and December 2011 surveys.
- The first main purpose of this survey is to continue the work of the
2011 studies (conducted by Mani Pande and Ayush Khanna), with a focus on tracking changes since last year and identifying trends. Which is why many questions are being repeated from last time.
- The second emphasis in this instance of the survey is to measure the
satisfaction of the editing community with the work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
- This is the first editor survey that includes a non-Wikipedia
project (Commons, for the questions that are non Wikipedia-specific).
- Thanks to everyone who commented on the draft questionnaire after we
solicited feedback on this list and in and IRC office hour, as well as to those who commented about the last survey. We made several changes based on the feedback, and tried to reply to all concerns.
- Also many thanks to all volunteer translators who reviewed or
contributed translations; the questionnaire is available in 14 languages (Italian, Polish and Portuguese will launch a bit later).
- As with the previous two surveys, the results will be published in
the following forms: A "topline" report detailing the percentage of responses for each question, a series of posts onhttps://blog.wikimedia.org analyzing the results, and a data set consisting of anonymized responses which others can use to do their own analyses. This time we will also aim to produce language-specific topline reports (an approach we already tested for Chinese with the data from the December 2011 survey).
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Wikimedia-l mailing listWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
-- *Sarah Stierch* *Museumist and open culture advocate*
Visit sarahstierch.com http://sarahstierch.com<<
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Hi,
the survey invitation is only shown to logged-in editors in languages where translations of the survey questionnaire exist (with Polish, Portuguese and Italian launching a bit later). If that doesn't work for you eventually, you are welcome to contact us offlist at survey (at) wikimedia.org, stating your user name and main project (the survey doesn't record the user ID, but it's needed to generate some data like admin status that is stored), and Beckie or I will send you a link. Many thanks for participating!
By the way, this may be a good occasion to remind everyone that anonymized datasets from the previous surveys are available at http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/surveys/ , and one from the current one will published there, too. As Sarah says, the results we published ourselves about the last surveys already contained some important information regarding the gender gap, but I'm sure that further interesting results can be extracted from these datasets, and since they are public you can examine them yourself!
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.comwrote:
On 10/30/12 7:08 PM, Keilana Wikipedia wrote:
Could I have a link to the survey please? I didn't get a notification for whatever reason.
I didn't see one either. I'm just assuming it'll pop up eventually. I'll ping Tilman and see what is up!
-Sarah
Keilana
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.comwrote:
FYI - and be sure to take the survey, please! It's all anonymous - it's a great idea to check your preferred gender if you so desire. This is the survey that gives us the gender gap percentage in Wikipedia. I'd love to see if the dial has moved at all since the past two years (where it's virtually been approximately 9% over all languages).
Sarah
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Wikimedia-l] 2012 Editor survey launched Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:25:24 -0700 From: Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org tbayer@wikimedia.org Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi all,
we have just launched the Foundation's 2012 editor survey; with invitations to participate being shown to logged-in users on Wikipedia and Commons.
A few quick facts about the survey (for more refer tohttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editor_Survey_2012 ):
- This is the third survey of editors as envisaged in the Foundation's
2010-15 strategic plan "in order to take the pulse of the community and identify pressing issues or concerns", after the April 2011 and December 2011 surveys.
- The first main purpose of this survey is to continue the work of the
2011 studies (conducted by Mani Pande and Ayush Khanna), with a focus on tracking changes since last year and identifying trends. Which is why many questions are being repeated from last time.
- The second emphasis in this instance of the survey is to measure the
satisfaction of the editing community with the work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
- This is the first editor survey that includes a non-Wikipedia
project (Commons, for the questions that are non Wikipedia-specific).
- Thanks to everyone who commented on the draft questionnaire after we
solicited feedback on this list and in and IRC office hour, as well as to those who commented about the last survey. We made several changes based on the feedback, and tried to reply to all concerns.
- Also many thanks to all volunteer translators who reviewed or
contributed translations; the questionnaire is available in 14 languages (Italian, Polish and Portuguese will launch a bit later).
- As with the previous two surveys, the results will be published in
the following forms: A "topline" report detailing the percentage of responses for each question, a series of posts onhttps://blog.wikimedia.org analyzing the results, and a data set consisting of anonymized responses which others can use to do their own analyses. This time we will also aim to produce language-specific topline reports (an approach we already tested for Chinese with the data from the December 2011 survey).
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Wikimedia-l mailing listWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
-- *Sarah Stierch* *Museumist and open culture advocate*
Visit sarahstierch.com http://sarahstierch.com<<
On 31/10/2012 02:48, Tilman Bayer wrote:
Hi,
the survey invitation is only shown to logged-in editors in languages where translations of the survey questionnaire exist (with Polish, Portuguese and Italian launching a bit later). If that doesn't work for you eventually, you are welcome to contact us offlist at survey (at) wikimedia.org http://wikimedia.org, stating your user name and main project (the survey doesn't record the user ID, but it's needed to generate some data like admin status that is stored), and Beckie or I will send you a link. Many thanks for participating!
Well, I don't see it either and I edit the English projects so I'm assuming translations isn't an issue.
KTC
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Katie Chan ktc@ktchan.info wrote:
On 31/10/2012 02:48, Tilman Bayer wrote:
Hi,
the survey invitation is only shown to logged-in editors in languages where translations of the survey questionnaire exist (with Polish, Portuguese and Italian launching a bit later). ...
Well, I don't see it either and I edit the English projects so I'm assuming translations isn't an issue.
KTC
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been posted yet?
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been posted yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Thanks, Sue
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been posted yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Showed up for me on ENWP.
-Pete
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Pete Forsyth peteforsyth@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been posted
yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Showed up for me on ENWP.
-Pete
I just saw it on Commons.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
I just started filling it out, noticed I'd missed a question, backspaced -- my browser said the last page wasn't available, then when I tried to go forward the next page wasn't available either. So it's gone, and no longer showing up on my Commons watchlist.
Sarah
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Pete Forsyth peteforsyth@gmail.comwrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been
posted yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Showed up for me on ENWP.
-Pete
I just saw it on Commons.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Yeah I only saw it on Wikidata and did it then.
I didn't see it at all on English Wikipedia. And that was from announcement until 6 pm tonight.
Sarah
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:17 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
I just started filling it out, noticed I'd missed a question, backspaced -- my browser said the last page wasn't available, then when I tried to go forward the next page wasn't available either. So it's gone, and no longer showing up on my Commons watchlist.
Sarah
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Pete Forsyth peteforsyth@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been posted yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Showed up for me on ENWP.
-Pete
I just saw it on Commons.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
I saw the notice on enwp and filled it out, but still see the notice in other projects (meta, nlwp, wiki source), so just keep on clicking on other projects and you can pick up where you left off Jane
2012/11/2 Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com
Yeah I only saw it on Wikidata and did it then.
I didn't see it at all on English Wikipedia. And that was from announcement until 6 pm tonight.
Sarah
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:17 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
I just started filling it out, noticed I'd missed a question, backspaced -- my browser said the last page wasn't available, then when I tried to go forward the next page wasn't available either. So it's gone, and no longer showing up on my Commons watchlist.
Sarah
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Pete Forsyth peteforsyth@gmail.comwrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been
posted yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Showed up for me on ENWP.
-Pete
I just saw it on Commons.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
It appears *ony once* for you across the whole of the Wikimedia sites. So if you ignore it the first time (like me) it will not display again.
Which is rather a poor design from a statistics perspective, but there you go :)
The link is still accessible though: just view source and find the banner code (it's in .mw-body #siteNotice). Alternatively add:
On 2 November 2012 03:49, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah I only saw it on Wikidata and did it then.
I didn't see it at all on English Wikipedia. And that was from announcement until 6 pm tonight.
Sarah
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:17 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
I just started filling it out, noticed I'd missed a question, backspaced -- my browser said the last page wasn't available, then when I tried to go forward the next page wasn't available either. So it's gone, and no longer showing up on my Commons watchlist.
Sarah
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Pete Forsyth peteforsyth@gmail.comwrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been
posted yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Showed up for me on ENWP.
-Pete
I just saw it on Commons.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Eck, sorry sent to sooon...
Alternatively add:
#editorSurvey2012 { display:block;}
To your personal CSS page and it will show up :)
Tom
It appears *ony once* for you across the whole of the Wikimedia sites. So
if you ignore it the first time (like me) it will not display again.
Which is rather a poor design from a statistics perspective, but there you go :)
The link is still accessible though: just view source and find the banner code (it's in .mw-body #siteNotice). Alternatively add:
On 2 November 2012 03:49, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah I only saw it on Wikidata and did it then.
I didn't see it at all on English Wikipedia. And that was from announcement until 6 pm tonight.
Sarah
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:17 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
I just started filling it out, noticed I'd missed a question, backspaced -- my browser said the last page wasn't available, then when I tried to go forward the next page wasn't available either. So it's gone, and no longer showing up on my Commons watchlist.
Sarah
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Pete Forsyth peteforsyth@gmail.comwrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been
posted yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Showed up for me on ENWP.
-Pete
I just saw it on Commons.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been posted
yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Thanks, Sue
Hi Sue, I'm not seeing it as an English WP watchlist notice, or on Meta.
Sarah
Hi Sarah and Katie, On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Katie Chan ktc@ktchan.info wrote:
On 31/10/2012 02:48, Tilman Bayer wrote:
Hi,
the survey invitation is only shown to logged-in editors in languages where translations of the survey questionnaire exist (with Polish, Portuguese and Italian launching a bit later). If that doesn't work for you eventually, you are welcome to contact us offlist at survey (at) wikimedia.org http://wikimedia.org, stating your user name and main
project (the survey doesn't record the user ID, but it's needed to generate some data like admin status that is stored), and Beckie or I will send you a link. Many thanks for participating!
Well, I don't see it either and I edit the English projects so I'm assuming translations isn't an issue.
KTC
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been posted yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Thanks, Sue
Hi Sue, I'm not seeing it as an English WP watchlist notice, or on Meta.
Sarah
Yes, the survey invitation banner has been activated on the English Wikipedia continuously since Wednesday, for logged-in users. (It's a CentralNotice banner rather than a watchlist notice which would show only on your watchlist.) It's not active on Meta.
There is some randomness involved when other banners are active at the same time (rotating), but if you have been viewing more than a couple of pages on the English Wikipedia during that time while logged in, the survey banner should have shown once. As said earlier, if you missed it or it missed you, then we are happy to send you a custom link to participate in the survey; contact us offlist as described. Thanks!
On 02/11/2012 18:16, Tilman Bayer wrote:
Yes, the survey invitation banner has been activated on the English Wikipedia continuously since Wednesday, for logged-in users. (It's a CentralNotice banner rather than a watchlist notice which would show only on your watchlist.) It's not active on Meta.
There is some randomness involved when other banners are active at the same time (rotating), but if you have been viewing more than a couple of pages on the English Wikipedia during that time while logged in, the survey banner should have shown once. As said earlier, if you missed it or it missed you, then we are happy to send you a custom link to participate in the survey; contact us offlist as described. Thanks!
Yes, I saw the offer of a manually crafted custom link to the survey so that's not an issue. The issue for me at this point is why it isn't showing consistently. If you want the survey to be representative, someone shouldn't have to ask for the link only after seeing messages on a mailing list most editors aren't subscribed to.
I played around editing Wikidata earlier, as a result have been accessing various non-English Wikipedia. Because of that, I've finally seen those survey banners as it has appeared to me on most of the non-English Wikipedia I visit. I've been on Wikipedia and Commons among others (a lot) every day this week, and I've yet to see the banner on a English language project. That banner is huge, so I couldn't have had missed it.
Since my (and seemingly others) experience doesn't match your expectation, something's wrong.
KTC