---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org Date: 16 February 2011 10:51 Subject: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender Gap Online? To: Communications Committee wmfcc-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Is There a Gender Gap Online? By Cristen Conger | Mon Feb 7, 2011 11:31 AM ET http://news.discovery.com/tech/is-there-a-gender-gap-online.html?print=true
When the online encyclopedia Wikipedia recently celebrated its 10th birthday, media outlets highlighted its stunning growth, number of articles, range of topics -- and its contributor gender gap.
A 2010 study co-sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation discovered that barely 15 percent of Wikipedia contributors are women, with the lion’s share of the articles being written, edited and updated by men in their mid-20s.
“(Online) public contexts such as web forums and Wikipedia, especially if they’re associated with domains such as politics, technology, or knowledge, are still overwhelmingly male-dominated,” said Susan C. Herring, a professor of information science at Indiana University who specializes in online communication. “These domains are important, and women’s relatively lesser participation in them is potentially a cause for concern.”
But that doesn’t mean women don’t have a presence on the Web. A few years ago, we wondered whether there was a gender gap in terms of who was getting online. A finding from the 2005 Pew Internet & American Life Project answered that.
The widely publicized Pew survey found a slightly higher number of American women online than men. And in the current social networking age, the ladies are still leading the pack. Multiple surveys, including a 2010 comScore report, consistently show more female engagement on sites like Twitter, Facebook and Flickr.
So when it comes to gender and the Internet today, the more pertinent question isn’t whether more men or women are surfing the Net, but whether they’re surfing the Net differently.
Take online communication, for instance. Real-world gender differences translate to differences in Internet interaction as well.
“My research into the gender dynamics of online discussion forums found that men tend to be more adversarial, and to tolerate contentious debate, more than women,” Herring said. "Women, in contrast, tend to be more polite and supportive, as well as less assertive … and (they) tend to be turned off by contentiousness, and may avoid online environments that they perceive as contentious.”
Those dynamics help explain why women have gravitated toward sharing on social networking sites while men move toward public domain content creation like Wikipedia, where articles can erupt with editing wars between contributors.
“Sites such as Facebook are 'walled gardens' -- users can select their friends and in general have more control over who enters their online space than in open forums, where any random person can come along and harass them or start a flame war,” Herring explained. “Facebook and Twitter are also oriented towards sharing personal information and social exchange, which women and girls are more drawn to do than men and boys are.”
Considering women’s active role on the Internet, online advertisers and sites are working to overcome certain gender barriers that have naturally arisen and finding new ways to attract larger female audiences.
In the case of Wikipedia, for instance, founder Jimmy Wales along with the Wikimedia Foundation have set a goal to increase its female contributor base to 25 percent by 2015.
And for younger generations growing up wired (or wireless) the ever-evolving Web landscape could become a more gender-neutral space with men and women equally engaged in social networking, content creation and collaboration.
“The Web seems to be evolving towards a better overall gender balance,” Herring said. “That is, instead of mostly male environments, there are now some environments in which females participate very actively as well.”
-- Sue Gardner Executive Director Wikimedia Foundation
415 839 6885 office 415 816 9967 cell
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
----- Original Message ----
From: Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org To: gendergap Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 12:51:48 PM Subject: [Gendergap] Fwd: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender Gap
Online? <snip>
So when it comes to gender and the Internet today, the more pertinent question isn’t whether more men or women are surfing the Net, but whether they’re surfing the Net differently.
<snip>
Completely anecdotal but I had an interesting conversation with my sister on Jan 15. She happened to be in-town staying the weekend with me and my hosting duties conflicted with the last minute WikiX meet-up so I asked her to come. In talking about this she asked me, "What do people use Wikipedia for anyways?" I couldn't believe she had really been unexposed to WP so I took her iPhone found the Google app and went through the whole alphabet on letter at a time to see her previous searches (BTW with her permission!). None of them would have brought her to Wikipedia. The large majority of them were shopping related. She has her BA, was a pharma rep until recently becoming a SAHM. Her traditional nuclear family with 2.5 kids has two laptops, an older desktop, and some kind of system that allows the TV to be a internet browser. Age-wise she falls in-between GenX and the Millennials. She uses the internet daily. Online she is really into coupons, shopping, and plans to start a cooking blog. And she honestly hadn't come across Wikipedia enough to understand what it was. Before this conversation I would have never believed that someone who considers becoming a blogger would had no understanding of what Wikipedia was and why people *used* it (i.e. as opposed to why they edited it).
In comparison, we are about the same age and spend about the same about of time online in our daily lives. However, I live alone, never finished my degree, work at an unremarkable office job, own a single laptop, don't even have a smart phone, but I have edited Wikipedia and Wikisource since 2006. I suspect it is the more basic life-style differences rather than the internet based ones that fuel the gender gap.I think this study raises a good point the internet participation, or likely a life-style well integrated with internet technologies, has no correlation with Wikipedia editing. The internet isn't what it was ten years ago. So while good internet access is imperative for participation in the wikis, the internet is too big and ubiquitous for us to assume any longer that everyone with good internet access will be brought to Wikipedia. Even though that was true in the past.
Complete speculation: I think this shows up stronger with women than men, because more men were early adopters back when the internet invariably led to Wikipedia. I don't think that amoung populations just getting good internet acces today that this gender gap will be quite so large. Although I still believe that the fact the interesting-to-men-topics have been so well-covered in Wikipedia by those male early adopters will ensure that the gender gap continues without intervention. (i.e. the gap might shrink in these populations because we will gain less of the men rather than gaining more women.)
Birgitte SB
Brigitte I bet it's also that she doesn't use for wikipedia for work. I think there was some study that showed that wikipedia and similar sites (in japan or England maybe) were accessed during work hours. I wish i could remember the details
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com wrote:
----- Original Message ----
From: Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org To: gendergap Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 12:51:48 PM Subject: [Gendergap] Fwd: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender Gap
Online?
<snip> > > So when it comes to gender and the Internet today, the more pertinent > question isn’t whether more men or women are surfing the Net, but > whether they’re surfing the Net differently. > <snip>
Completely anecdotal but I had an interesting conversation with my sister on Jan 15. She happened to be in-town staying the weekend with me and my hosting duties conflicted with the last minute WikiX meet-up so I asked her to come. In talking about this she asked me, "What do people use Wikipedia for anyways?" I couldn't believe she had really been unexposed to WP so I took her iPhone found the Google app and went through the whole alphabet on letter at a time to see her previous searches (BTW with her permission!). None of them would have brought her to Wikipedia. The large majority of them were shopping related. She has her BA, was a pharma rep until recently becoming a SAHM. Her traditional nuclear family with 2.5 kids has two laptops, an older desktop, and some kind of system that allows the TV to be a internet browser. Age-wise she falls in-between GenX and the Millennials. She uses the internet daily. Online she is really into coupons, shopping, and plans to start a cooking blog. And she honestly hadn't come across Wikipedia enough to understand what it was. Before this conversation I would have never believed that someone who considers becoming a blogger would had no understanding of what Wikipedia was and why people *used* it (i.e. as opposed to why they edited it).
In comparison, we are about the same age and spend about the same about of time online in our daily lives. However, I live alone, never finished my degree, work at an unremarkable office job, own a single laptop, don't even have a smart phone, but I have edited Wikipedia and Wikisource since 2006. I suspect it is the more basic life-style differences rather than the internet based ones that fuel the gender gap.I think this study raises a good point the internet participation, or likely a life-style well integrated with internet technologies, has no correlation with Wikipedia editing. The internet isn't what it was ten years ago. So while good internet access is imperative for participation in the wikis, the internet is too big and ubiquitous for us to assume any longer that everyone with good internet access will be brought to Wikipedia. Even though that was true in the past.
Complete speculation: I think this shows up stronger with women than men, because more men were early adopters back when the internet invariably led to Wikipedia. I don't think that amoung populations just getting good internet acces today that this gender gap will be quite so large. Although I still believe that the fact the interesting-to-men-topics have been so well-covered in Wikipedia by those male early adopters will ensure that the gender gap continues without intervention. (i.e. the gap might shrink in these populations because we will gain less of the men rather than gaining more women.)
Birgitte SB
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Well she no longer works. But certainly she had little use for it (and little time for the internet at all) when she did work. I do occasionally use Wikpedia for work to confirm chemicals being asked for (i.e. Was Muriatic Acid another name for Hydrochloric acid or Hydrofluoric acid) Chemical names are very non-standard on the application side. For five years an co-worker from Albania had been asking people for where in the hardware store he might find the Calcium Hydroxide for a special recipe. He knew it was a commonly used item but had been completely unable to locate it in America and everyone would tell him they had never heard of it. Finally I looked it up on Wikipedia and said "Oh you want LIME." And that is the majority of my work-time usage of Wikipedia, figuring out answers for the water-cooler.
Birgitte SB
----- Original Message ----
From: Sandra sandratordonez@gmail.com To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 4:59:14 PM Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Fwd: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender Gap Online?
Brigitte I bet it's also that she doesn't use for wikipedia for work. I think there was some study that showed that wikipedia and similar sites (in japan or England maybe) were accessed during work hours. I wish i could remember the details
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com wrote:
----- Original Message ----
From: Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org To: gendergap Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 12:51:48 PM Subject: [Gendergap] Fwd: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender Gap
Online?
<snip> > > So when it comes to gender and the Internet today, the more pertinent > question isn’t whether more men or women are surfing the Net, but > whether they’re surfing the Net differently. > <snip>
Completely anecdotal but I had an interesting conversation with my sister on
Jan
- She happened to be in-town staying the weekend with me and my hosting
duties conflicted with the last minute WikiX meet-up so I asked her to
come. In
talking about this she asked me, "What do people use Wikipedia for
anyways?" I
couldn't believe she had really been unexposed to WP so I took her iPhone
found
the Google app and went through the whole alphabet on letter at a time to
see
her previous searches (BTW with her permission!). None of them would have brought her to Wikipedia. The large majority of them were shopping
related.
She has her BA, was a pharma rep until recently becoming a SAHM. Her traditional nuclear family with 2.5 kids has two laptops, an older
desktop,
and some kind of system that allows the TV to be a internet browser.
Age-wise
she falls in-between GenX and the Millennials. She uses the internet daily.
Online she is really into coupons, shopping, and plans to start a cooking
blog.
And she honestly hadn't come across Wikipedia enough to understand what it
was.
Before this conversation I would have never believed that someone who
considers
becoming a blogger would had no understanding of what Wikipedia was and why
people *used* it (i.e. as opposed to why they edited it).
In comparison, we are about the same age and spend about the same about of
time
online in our daily lives. However, I live alone, never finished my degree,
work
at an unremarkable office job, own a single laptop, don't even have a smart
phone, but I have edited Wikipedia and Wikisource since 2006. I suspect it
is
the more basic life-style differences rather than the internet based ones
that
fuel the gender gap.I think this study raises a good point the internet participation, or likely a life-style well integrated with internet technologies, has no correlation with Wikipedia editing. The internet isn't
what it was ten years ago. So while good internet access is imperative for participation in the wikis, the internet is too big and ubiquitous for us to
assume any longer that everyone with good internet access will be brought to
Wikipedia. Even though that was true in the past.
Complete speculation: I think this shows up stronger with women than men, because more men were early adopters back when the internet invariably led
to
Wikipedia. I don't think that amoung populations just getting good internet
acces today that this gender gap will be quite so large. Although I still believe that the fact the interesting-to-men-topics have been so
well-covered in
Wikipedia by those male early adopters will ensure that the gender gap
continues
without intervention. (i.e. the gap might shrink in these populations
because we
will gain less of the men rather than gaining more women.)
Birgitte SB
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
LOL. i think lots of the hours I logged in were for researching personal interests or time killing....I'm sorry, I didn't express it well, but essentially in offices, particularly in the afternoon, people's internet use sky rocketed. I suspect b/c they want to appear busy, but are surfing. But I imagine this is a reality that affects who is contributing. Since you said she was a pharmacy rep, I just imagined she spent lots of time in face to face interactions, meeting with doctors etc. ...not chained to a desk, etc.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com wrote:
Well she no longer works. But certainly she had little use for it (and little time for the internet at all) when she did work. I do occasionally use Wikpedia for work to confirm chemicals being asked for (i.e. Was Muriatic Acid another name for Hydrochloric acid or Hydrofluoric acid) Chemical names are very non-standard on the application side. For five years an co-worker from Albania had been asking people for where in the hardware store he might find the Calcium Hydroxide for a special recipe. He knew it was a commonly used item but had been completely unable to locate it in America and everyone would tell him they had never heard of it. Finally I looked it up on Wikipedia and said "Oh you want LIME." And that is the majority of my work-time usage of Wikipedia, figuring out answers for the water-cooler.
Birgitte SB
----- Original Message ----
From: Sandra sandratordonez@gmail.com To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 4:59:14 PM Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Fwd: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender
Gap
Online?
Brigitte I bet it's also that she doesn't use for wikipedia for work. I think there was some study that showed that wikipedia and similar
sites (in
japan or England maybe) were accessed during work hours. I wish i could remember the details
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com
wrote:
----- Original Message ----
From: Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org To: gendergap Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 12:51:48 PM Subject: [Gendergap] Fwd: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender
Gap
Online?
<snip> > > So when it comes to gender and the Internet today, the more
pertinent
question isn’t whether more men or women are surfing the Net, but whether they’re surfing the Net differently.
<snip>
Completely anecdotal but I had an interesting conversation with my
sister on
Jan
- She happened to be in-town staying the weekend with me and my
hosting
duties conflicted with the last minute WikiX meet-up so I asked her to
come. In
talking about this she asked me, "What do people use Wikipedia for
anyways?" I
couldn't believe she had really been unexposed to WP so I took her
iPhone
found
the Google app and went through the whole alphabet on letter at a time
to
see
her previous searches (BTW with her permission!). None of them would
have
brought her to Wikipedia. The large majority of them were shopping
related.
She has her BA, was a pharma rep until recently becoming a SAHM. Her traditional nuclear family with 2.5 kids has two laptops, an older
desktop,
and some kind of system that allows the TV to be a internet browser.
Age-wise
she falls in-between GenX and the Millennials. She uses the internet
daily.
Online she is really into coupons, shopping, and plans to start a
cooking
blog.
And she honestly hadn't come across Wikipedia enough to understand
what it
was.
Before this conversation I would have never believed that someone who
considers
becoming a blogger would had no understanding of what Wikipedia was
and why
people *used* it (i.e. as opposed to why they edited it).
In comparison, we are about the same age and spend about the same
about of
time
online in our daily lives. However, I live alone, never finished my
degree,
work
at an unremarkable office job, own a single laptop, don't even have a
smart
phone, but I have edited Wikipedia and Wikisource since 2006. I
suspect it
is
the more basic life-style differences rather than the internet based
ones
that
fuel the gender gap.I think this study raises a good point the
internet
participation, or likely a life-style well integrated with internet technologies, has no correlation with Wikipedia editing. The internet
isn't
what it was ten years ago. So while good internet access is imperative
for
participation in the wikis, the internet is too big and ubiquitous for
us to
assume any longer that everyone with good internet access will be
brought to
Wikipedia. Even though that was true in the past.
Complete speculation: I think this shows up stronger with women than
men,
because more men were early adopters back when the internet invariably
led
to
Wikipedia. I don't think that amoung populations just getting good
internet
acces today that this gender gap will be quite so large. Although I
still
believe that the fact the interesting-to-men-topics have been so
well-covered in
Wikipedia by those male early adopters will ensure that the gender gap
continues
without intervention. (i.e. the gap might shrink in these populations
because we
will gain less of the men rather than gaining more women.)
Birgitte SB
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
You are basically correct. She had a rather rural territory so she spent more time driving between offices than anything else. She didn't even have a desk. At least not in any sort of sense like the one I am chained to. But I imagine her internet use was a great deal less when she was working in general terms. She certainly never considered starting a blog until after she had quit and began to spend a lot more time *reading* blogs. Yet during the past year when I imagine she has discovered a number of new things on the internet beside coupon blogs, she hasn't discovered Wikipedia.
I am certain you are right that sitting at a desk has an impact on contributions. However I was frankly flabbergasted that she did not even understand *what a reader* would use Wikipedia and had difficulty explaining it, hence my failed effort to prove she had used it without realizing it by looking through her past google searches.
Birgitte SB
From: Sandra ordonez sandratordonez@gmail.com To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 8:27:54 PM Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Fwd: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender Gap Online?
LOL. i think lots of the hours I logged in were for researching personal interests or time killing....I'm sorry, I didn't express it well, but essentially in offices, particularly in the afternoon, people's internet use sky rocketed. I suspect b/c they want to appear busy, but are surfing. But I imagine this is a reality that affects who is contributing. Since you said she was a pharmacy rep, I just imagined she spent lots of time in face to face interactions, meeting with doctors etc. ...not chained to a desk, etc.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com wrote:
Well she no longer works. But certainly she had little use for it (and little
time for the internet at all) when she did work. I do occasionally use
Wikpedia
for work to confirm chemicals being asked for (i.e. Was Muriatic Acid another name for Hydrochloric acid or Hydrofluoric acid) Chemical names are very non-standard on the application side. For five years an co-worker from
Albania
had been asking people for where in the hardware store he might find the
Calcium
Hydroxide for a special recipe. He knew it was a commonly used item but had
been
completely unable to locate it in America and everyone would tell him they had never heard of it. Finally I looked it up on Wikipedia and said "Oh you want LIME." And that is the majority of my work-time usage of Wikipedia, figuring out answers for the water-cooler.
Birgitte SB
----- Original Message ----
From: Sandra sandratordonez@gmail.com To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 4:59:14 PM Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Fwd: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender Gap Online?
Brigitte I bet it's also that she doesn't use for wikipedia for work. I think there was some study that showed that wikipedia and similar sites
(in
japan or England maybe) were accessed during work hours. I wish i could remember the details
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com wrote:
----- Original Message ----
From: Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org To: gendergap Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 12:51:48 PM Subject: [Gendergap] Fwd: [PRESS] Discovery News: Is There A Gender Gap
Online?
<snip> > > So when it comes to gender and the Internet today, the more pertinent > question isn’t whether more men or women are surfing the Net, but > whether they’re surfing the Net differently. > <snip>
Completely anecdotal but I had an interesting conversation with my sister
on
Jan
- She happened to be in-town staying the weekend with me and my
hosting
duties conflicted with the last minute WikiX meet-up so I asked her to
come. In
talking about this she asked me, "What do people use Wikipedia for
anyways?" I
couldn't believe she had really been unexposed to WP so I took her iPhone
found
the Google app and went through the whole alphabet on letter at a time to
see
her previous searches (BTW with her permission!). None of them would
have
brought her to Wikipedia. The large majority of them were shopping
related.
She has her BA, was a pharma rep until recently becoming a SAHM. Her traditional nuclear family with 2.5 kids has two laptops, an older
desktop,
and some kind of system that allows the TV to be a internet browser.
Age-wise
she falls in-between GenX and the Millennials. She uses the internet
daily.
Online she is really into coupons, shopping, and plans to start a cooking
blog.
And she honestly hadn't come across Wikipedia enough to understand what
it
was.
Before this conversation I would have never believed that someone who
considers
becoming a blogger would had no understanding of what Wikipedia was and
why
people *used* it (i.e. as opposed to why they edited it).
In comparison, we are about the same age and spend about the same about
of
time
online in our daily lives. However, I live alone, never finished my
degree,
work
at an unremarkable office job, own a single laptop, don't even have a
smart
phone, but I have edited Wikipedia and Wikisource since 2006. I suspect
it
is
the more basic life-style differences rather than the internet based ones
that
fuel the gender gap.I think this study raises a good point the internet participation, or likely a life-style well integrated with internet technologies, has no correlation with Wikipedia editing. The internet
isn't
what it was ten years ago. So while good internet access is imperative
for
participation in the wikis, the internet is too big and ubiquitous for us
to
assume any longer that everyone with good internet access will be brought
to
Wikipedia. Even though that was true in the past.
Complete speculation: I think this shows up stronger with women than men, because more men were early adopters back when the internet invariably
led
to
Wikipedia. I don't think that amoung populations just getting good
internet
acces today that this gender gap will be quite so large. Although I
still
believe that the fact the interesting-to-men-topics have been so
well-covered in
Wikipedia by those male early adopters will ensure that the gender gap
continues
without intervention. (i.e. the gap might shrink in these populations
because we
will gain less of the men rather than gaining more women.)
Birgitte SB
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
-- Sandra Ordonez Web Astronaut
"Helping you rock out in the virtual world."
www.collaborativenation.com