http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/bitwise/2014/12/wikipedia_editing_d...
GENDER GAP TASK FORCE FTW
Excellent!
Lightbreather
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/bitwise/2014/12/wikipedia_editing_d...
GENDER GAP TASK FORCE FTW
--
Sarah Stierch
Diverse and engaging consulting for your organization.
www.sarahstierch.com
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Well, I suppose the Arbitration Committee will now figure out why I thought the case name should be changed.
Risker/Anne
On 11 December 2014 at 17:38, LB lightbreather2@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent!
Lightbreather
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/bitwise/2014/12/wikipedia_editing_d...
GENDER GAP TASK FORCE FTW
--
Sarah Stierch
Diverse and engaging consulting for your organization.
www.sarahstierch.com
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
On 12/11/2014 6:13 PM, Risker wrote:
Well, I suppose the Arbitration Committee will now figure out why I thought the case name should be changed.
Risker/Anne
The name is accurate. It was the interactions at GGTF that started the hullabaloo. The Arbitration committee was coming out against it until someone brought SPECIFICO's harassment of me to ANI, several GGTF people got up to document/complain about it happening at GGTF, and SPECIFICO got interaction banned.
At that point Sitush went crazy, screaming about outing and researching me, site banning me, writing the bio, which ended up with and Misc for Deletion and an ANI.
Suddenly Arbitration comittee decided "GGTF" was important enough.
Like Sitush, did enough Arbitrators think these WOMEN (and their supporters) were getting just TOO uppity and getting males in trouble for their mere boys will be boys (harassment) behavior?
Remember a couple of them were convinced by some liars that GGTF was strongly behind the proposal that a woman's edits only could be reverted by TWO male editors? It took several people with diffs to disabuse them of that notion!!!
So this really was very much about GGTF and interactions there.
CM
I kept providing this link to editors and Arbitrators during Arbitration to show just how obsessed the media is Wikipedia's gendergap, but who believes this loud mouthed woman? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias...
Of course I will have to point out I already was banned before I wrote the OUTRAGEOUS comment he quotes. But I must admit it is an accurate and well-turned phrase... ( “the Manchester Gangbangers and their cronies/minions.”)
I thought this all might happen pretty fast, way before I had my detailed the scandal ad nauseam on my updated carolmoore.net website. (It's 8 years out of date cause I spent too much time on Wikipedia.) I'm so happy I'll be able to greatly improve my own site (and my others) with all the brain exercise and research knowledge I've gained over the years.
CM
On 12/11/2014 4:34 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/bitwise/2014/12/wikipedia_editing_d...
GENDER GAP TASK FORCE FTW
--
Sarah Stierch