On 2/24/11 2:13 PM, James Salsman wrote: [speaking as me, not as a Foundation representative] The term "fellow" has *many* different meanings; Wiktionary can provide a good many of them. In this particular instance, "fellow" follows the academic term; meaning a person taking a stipend to conduct a specific area of study. In that term, it also follows another definition of the term "fellow"; that of a companion, a comrade, an associate. And my understanding of "WikiChix" is that it's a community movement, not a Foundation one for all that it was founded by a Board of Trustees member. It's also based off of the LinuxChix movement, again a community movement. Some women embrace this term, some do not. Over the last 5-10 years or so there has been a movement to begin reclaiming the various signifiers of femininity that were eschewed during the feminist revolution of the 70s: the color pink, needlecraft, the term "chick," etc. Personally, i embrace "chick"... it makes me feel young and not like the old lady i fear i'm becoming way too quickly ;) We can argue etymology until the cows come home. But in my mind, it's a red herring. Words do shape Worlds (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity, or as we call it in anthropology the Whorf-Sapir Hypothesis), but i'm not sure this is the battle to fight. This is especially true in light of all the other problems/solutions that have been highlighted on this list and others which are related: new user welcoming committees, less biting of people (new or otherwise), and other on-wiki social changes that would make the site welcoming to new editors of all genders. i personally would rather devote my efforts to working on these other issues than arguing over what we call the people who come in to work on projects, or what individuals call their mailing lists. If we spend too much time fighting over words, we really will lose sight of the forest for the trees. -Christine