I know that it is not typically stringently enforced on mailing lists, but I think that enforcing [[WP:CIVIL]] would be a good idea on this list. I can understand concerns over any form of moderation, but believe that for this list the benefits far outweigh the costs. An open atmosphere where everyone feels comfortable participating is necessary for this list to have any purpose - and [[WP:CIVIL]] enforcement would be a good first step towards establishing that.
I'm not, to be clear, suggesting the moderation of dissenting viewpoints. Iâm just suggesting that because of the nature of this list it would be especially, extraordinarily, unusually counterproductive to allow a combative or uncivil environment to take root here.
I'm also tempted to just say that we should broadly defer to Sarah in moderation. I trust her judgment, and I cannot imagine her trying to censor viewpoints just because she disagrees with them.
Kevin Gorman
Enforcement of our civility rules on this list is inappropriate as it may be applied to women posters who may have grievances. Not that venting is appropriate.
Fred