--
Krystle Chung
Community Support
http://www.wikihow.com/User:Krystle
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Nathan
nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
> ArbCom is weak, and loathe to make any decision that might trigger a
> backlash. They are incapable of dealing with serious, long-term problems
> and seem able only to address minor issues that would otherwise resolve on
> their own. The English Wikipedia is ungoverned and ungovernable, and the
> norms of behavior are too palsied to make enforcement of policy even
> slightly consistent. The whole endeavor makes more sense if we simply
> accept that it exists in a state of anarchy and that this will likely not
> change.
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:09 PM, LB
lightbreather2@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> This is what is about to happen at the English Wikipedia ArbCom re
>> disruption at the Gender Gap Task Force:
>> *Five men and two women were involved parties in the case.
>> *One women is about to be site banned.
>> *The other woman is about to be topic banned from the GGTF.
>> *All five men are going to be free to edit.
>>
>> It is noteworthy, IMO, that only 1 of the 12 arbitrators is a woman
>> (GorillaWarfare, bless her, who is not for giving WP's #1 trouble-maker,
>> Eric Corbet, yet *another* chance). Here is a link to the Proposed
>> decision page:
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender_Gap...
>>
>> And to the talk page:
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gende...
>>
>> Lightbreather
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>