If Arbcom members actually posted information which could be considered "outing" in violation of WMF policies, please take that information to the Ombudsmen Commission. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission
Pine
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Neotarf neotarf@gmail.com wrote:
The arbitration committee has never responded to any of my emails, although some individual arbitrators were willing to communicate with me while I was writing the arbitration report for the Signpost. Would you like screenshots of the bounce notifications? In addition, four arbitrators posted personally identifying information about me and did not respond to my requests to remove it.
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:05 AM, JJ Marr jjmarr@gmail.com wrote:
"I emailed the WMF in relation to my enwiki arbcom case"
You're getting ignored because the WMF doesn't want to get involved in community processes. Sorry to be blunt, but you should try emailing ArbCom before making this type of posting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committe e/Procedures#Standard_provision:_appeals_and_modifications
On 09 Jul 2017 1:47 AM, "Neotarf" neotarf@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, this is to let everyone know that I have submitted an appeal to the GGTF case.
It has been very difficult to try to respond to the accusations in this arbitration case, because I don't understand them. Everyone who has looked at the diffs has found nothing. Kevin Gorman called them "flimsy". Even Wikipediocracy, which has no particular love for me, could find nothing. After having had time to go through some of the histories, I found that half of the diffs were from someone who wrote a program specifically to collect diffs of my edits in order to sift through them and who was able to use the program to discover IP addresses as well. The other half of the diffs were added to the case by one of the arbitrators after the evidence phase of the case had closed and included edits made by Jimmy Wales and one of the admins--not even my edits. I don't want to say a lot about this on a public mailing list, but at this point it is pretty obvious that this is a false conviction.
I understand I was eligible to appeal this after one year, however I have waited more than two years. My initial inquiry to the WMF was on 11/17/16. I was assigned a member of the WMF staff and told I could expect to hear something in mid-January. Since then, I have made three followup queries, asking for an update to the expected timeline, but have been unable to get any response at all. At this point, there is no reason to believe the non-response is not deliberate.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap