As far as I remember the "nake-hub" of commons (As i call it) has no problem at all with homosexuality. Who has the problem is the other side of commons, the "puritans" (several here in that list) who cant see a naked picture - wherever is there is a man, a woman, a hetero sex relation, a gay or lesbian one.
PS.: I just don't do the draw myself because I don't have the skills to do it. _____ *Béria Lima*
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho. http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos*
On 29 April 2012 21:19, Michelle Gallaway mgallaway@gmail.com wrote:
This is a great idea. We'll see if the bleating that the image is "educational" is quite so strong if it's male-on-male ;-)
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Carol Moore DC <carolmooredc@verizon.net
wrote:
On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
I could have a go again, Carol. >:)
Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.
Andreas
So if I was too implicit in my statement. As Andreas surmised, I meant re-do that photo to make it male on male. Or do a second one that's male on male. Go for it!
As for female "ejaculation" since ejaculation is putting out sperm, I don't think women do it.
Women obviously -- geez, I don't what you call it besides "get wet." And maybe orgasms squeeze some of it out an orifice. But I don't think that's ejaculation. But I do now know I don't what the technical terms are or if there are any!!
CM
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap