Dear, I would like to draw your attention to the history of article "migrantas" an initiative in Berlin on the empowerment of migrant women, that was deleted by the concept autopromotion and later by the attribution of irrelevance.Men and women worked for improving it but it seems without results.It would be good to have some suggestions on that.best regards, Patricia
(del/undel) 15:12, April 7, 2011 JamesBWatson (talk | contribs |block) deleted "Migrantas" ‎ (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: and WP:CSD#G12: copyright infringement of http://www.balsas.cc/project-migrantasorg-looking-dialogue-pictograms/) (view/restore)
There was only one edit, the edit by Migrantas-Berlin creating it.
That's the English Wikipedia.
Fred
For example do a google search for "Each drawing is shown and commented upon within the group" which is a sentence in the deleted article. It gets three hits, for example:
http://www.grassrootsfeminism.net/cms/node/310
I think what needs to be done is to do the article over again without doing the extensive word for word copying. It seems notable. As to "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" there was only one editor, who also was blocked. creation of that article seems to be their only edit:
(del/undel) 15:22, April 7, 2011 JamesBWatson (talk | contribs | block) blocked Migrantas-Berlin (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ ({{spamusernameblock}}) (unblock | change block)
This block is within the rules as the user name is the name of the project they were promoting in their only edit. They can create an account with a different name.
Fred