The Resources page links to forty-eight mainstream and tech articles with another 30 or 40 reprints or summaries of those in smaller mainstream publications. The fourteen blog and other entries are just a smattering of the higher quality blog and activist commentary on Wikipedia. So there is a lot of good work being done, in between the crappy commentary. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Carolmooredc/My_Sandbox_1
On 9/11/2014 8:14 PM, LB wrote:
I hear you, but I would very much like to see some good newsrooms (real journalists) do regular reporting on Wikipedia. I think it would be hard on the community at first, but ultimately would help. WP is a hostile work environment and I for one am tired of it.
Lightbreather
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Risker <risker.wp@gmail.com mailto:risker.wp@gmail.com> wrote:
Frankly, I see little value in creating a site whose goal includes attracting journalists - particularly given the poor quality, sensationalistic journalism that we've all seen "reporting" on anything Wikimedia. Risker/Anne