Dear Ellie Young Thank you for this information.
Aside, the parameter used for your calculation which is the no of eligible applicants from Africa. I am of the opinion that your parameter only window dress the effect of the selection to show that the selection is fair to Africa.
However, if you used "Total Number of Scholarships awarded against the number of African selected" you will noticed that we only have 3%. Though, we may not have the voice to push through our points, but the fact remains the selection is just unfair to the world second largest continent. http://www.africapedia.com/-SIZE-OF-AFRICA-COMPARED-TO-OTHER-CONTINENTS.
Though, you mentioned that "Geography regions are "not" the emphasis of the program'. In my opinion, this is the missing link in the organisation of the event year in year out. No wonder, some continents are fast developing while others are struggling. I
Let's take a clue...
Olaniyan Olushola Director, WUGN Treasurer, FOSSFA MD, Olbims Consulting Phone: +2348154876844 Email: olaniyanshola15@gmail.com|olaniyanshola@yahoo.com|treasurer@fossfa.net User page: Olaniyan Olushola Facebook: Olaniyan Shola Twitter :Olaniyan73
Original Message From: african-wikimedians-request@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 8:25 PM To: african-wikimedians@lists.wikimedia.org Reply To: african-wikimedians@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: African-Wikimedians Digest, Vol 8, Issue 34
Send African-Wikimedians mailing list submissions to african-wikimedians@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to african-wikimedians-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at african-wikimedians-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of African-Wikimedians digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Wikimania (Ellie Young)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:40:27 -0800 From: Ellie Young eyoung@wikimedia.org To: Isla Haddow Flood isla@wikiloveswomen.org Cc: Mailing list for African Wikimedians african-wikimedians@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [African Wikimedians] Wikimania Message-ID: CA+cWZG5vkcm6E9kzyTYDLYRU6i79x81aDhaR7syAnYdXs-HNww@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Isla,
I am in the process of putting up information from the scholarship committee onto the wiki and will respond to the other thread on wikimania-l soon.
124 Scholarships were awarded.
Of the 400 scholarships that passed into Phase 2 of the review, 20 were African applicants passed Phase 2. 4 of those got scholarships, so by my calculations that's 20% of the eligible African applicants.
Geographic regions are *not* the emphasis of the program.
You might want to take this up directly with the Scholarship Committee if you have ideas for changes to the program in the future?
Ellie Young WMF Events Manager on behalf of the Scholarship Committee
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Isla Haddow Flood isla@wikiloveswomen.org wrote:
Okay - so - of 170 potential full and partial scholarships offered by the WMF, Africa got 4.
FOUR.
that is 0.02% of what was on offer.
Mexico I could understand was difficult to access. BUT you couldn’t get closer to Africa than Italy, if you tried.
That is just not acceptable.
On 11 Mar 2016, at 3:50 PM, Douglas Scott douglas.i.scott@gmail.com wrote:
I got a partial scholarship which means I wont have to pay to be at the conference venue but I will have to pay for my own flight.
On 11 March 2016 at 15:43, Ian Gilfillan wikimediaza@greenman.co.za wrote:
I applied, also didn't get.
On 11/03/2016 14:46, Isla Haddow Flood wrote:
Hello All
Just want to do a quick head count to see who got a scholarship to attend Wikimania. Please just let us know who got one, and who didn’t.
thanks! Isla
African-Wikimedians mailing list African-Wikimedians@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
-- Douglas Ian Scott 司道格 Skype: douglas0scott South African mobile number: +27 (0)79 515 8727 _______________________________________________ African-Wikimedians mailing list African-Wikimedians@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
*Isla Haddow-Flood* Project Manager: WikiAfrica Username: Islahaddow
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Olushola Olaniyan < olaniyanshola15@gmail.com> wrote:
However, if you used "Total Number of Scholarships awarded against the number of African selected" you will noticed that we only have 3%. Though, we may not have the voice to push through our points, but the fact remains the selection is just unfair to the world second largest continent. http://www.africapedia.com/-SIZE-OF-AFRICA-COMPARED-TO-OTHER-CONTINENTS.
Why is the size of the continent a relevant factor to decide scholarships by? I think your rhetoric can be a very double-edged sword. For example, wouldn't a far more relevant metric for *Wikimedia* scholarships be "size of active editor community"? According to *that* metric, Africans would be *over-represented* compared to their share of global edits, and English and German editors under-represented. That doesn't sound like a good result either, does it?
Though, you mentioned that "Geography regions are "not" the emphasis of the
program'. In my opinion, this is the missing link in the organisation of the event year in year out.
I would like you to substantiate this opinion. Why is a geographical focus "the missing link"? Why is it more important than other considerations? (Have you read the selection crtieria?[1])
No wonder, some continents are fast developing while others are struggling. I
You are implying that not being awarded more Wikimania scholarships is the reason Wikimedia communities in Africa are struggling. I think that is *obviously* false. I think everyone on this list is quite aware of the many challenges, historical, colonial, economic, linguistic, and political, that are shaping the difficult environmental conditions for free knowledge in Africa. Infrastructure, educational levels and the languages of instruction, availability of secondary sources, poverty, oral culture, etc., -- are *all* far more influential on the development (and struggle) of African Wikimedia communities than the number of people who get to attend Wikimania.
I would like to see a more forthright attitude in discussing these challenges. It is understandable that folks are frustrated that they did not get a scholarship this time -- and as Rexford pointed out, this is a perennial conversation around this time of year -- but let us not throw around irrelevant metrics like the size of the continent instead of substantively discussing the actual selection criteria. If you disagree with the criteria[1], by all means express it directly, and explain why a particular criterion is inappropriate, or too exclusionary, or would yield low value for money, or whatever.
But complaining on the basis of non-facts (such as the baseless expectation that every country on earth *must* be represented at Wikimania, which some complaints relied on) would not get this conversation (and potential change!) anywhere. In general, arguments of the form "the process is broken, and my proof is that I did not get a scholarship" are not a good basis for discussion.
I think the Scholarships Committee, and the Wikimania coordinator at WMF, would be genuinely interested in a respectful and substantive conversation on how to improve the selection.
A.
[1] https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Scholarships#Selection_criteria
african-wikimedians@lists.wikimedia.org