2008/7/18 Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
Ken I don't find your paraphrase of what the underlying issue is to be accurately reflective of the argument's so far in-world.
Rather it would seem that there are several differing arguments for the spelling used currently, and several for the alternate view.
Your chief argument has been "you eed a source to show that it's a mistake", an idea which seems to be supported only by you.
You need to get several heavy-duty-very-well-regarded sources that clearly says it's a mistake and then they would over-ride common usage and you can then move the article, otherwise no way.