On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:23 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have mistaken your personal viewpoint for a neutral viewpoint. This is of course an eternal hazard.
And perhaps you, yours. It seems to me that we cannot achieve a reasonable simulacrum of neutrality (for it is probably impossible to be entirely neutral in the face of aniconic/anit-censorship dogmatism) without accepting that some compromise has to be made.