On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:23 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You appear to have mistaken your personal viewpoint
for a neutral
viewpoint. This is of course an eternal hazard.
And perhaps you, yours. It seems to me that we cannot achieve a
reasonable simulacrum of neutrality (for it is probably impossible to
be entirely neutral in the face of aniconic/anit-censorship dogmatism)
without accepting that some compromise has to be made.