On 29/12/2008, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Allow blocking on a more granular level, if we know his ISP, and lock
> out moves and redirects for the whole damn ISPs, and specifically
> point the finger back in the block message: Blocked because of
> JarlaxleArtemis/Grawp with a nice shiny link to his long-term abuse
> page.
on 12/29/08 6:02 PM, Ian Woollard at ian.woollard(a)gmail.com wrote:
It probably wouldn't work because of proxies and people that would
emulate/help him.
Still, ideas that would affect less people rather than more like that
are almost certainly IMO the way to go; for example restricting the
range of characters and checking that the move title consists of words
in a dictionary before permitting non admins or users with a small
number of edits to complete a move might be desirable.
Hey, guys! This whole thing could go away rather quickly if one (or more) of
the persons who feel victimized by him simply made a formal complaint to the
police.
Marc Riddell