Well, it looks like the case is closing, not with a bang but with a whimper... it's got the four net support votes (with no opposing votes) to close, so unless somebody votes against closing before the 24 hours runs out at 19:24 UTC, it's closed. What will be in the final decision (if no votes change by then) is a whole heap of principles (some of them with a degree of tension between them), a few findings and remedies (none of which actually call for any flat link bans) and absolutely no enforcement provisions. The community is encouraged to develop a policy, and editors are "encouraged to show due consideration for the feelings of other Wikipedians, and to refrain from idly or frivolously making references to malicious sites."
What it means is that, as the discussion of proposed policies proceeds, nobody in it will have the opportunity for a cheap shot of making an "Argument from Authority" that "ArbCom said it; I believe it; end of argument", as has so often been the case for the last year.