On Nov 30, 2007 12:52 AM, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
You don't see any difference between an investigation and a block? Need I remind you that only blocking is an admin action? Need I also remind you that the thrust of Durova's investigation appears to have been that !! was the reincarnation of a previous experienced editor; which, of course, was quite true?
You have completely ignored the tone of the "report", the clear statement that the 'evidence' is a demonstration not merely that !! is a returning editor, but that !! is one of 'them' who share information from a 'playbook' on how to disrupt WP. I can only assume you have either not yet read it, or that you have read it and are still unable to see that most people who read it more than cursorily will understand that the clear implication is that !! is blockworthy. Indeed, if you have read it carefully, and you do not see it, and you still do not see it even after it has been pointed out to you, as I have once already, I'm afraid I must once again question your judgment.
RR