On Nov 30, 2007 12:52 AM, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You don't see any difference between an investigation and a block?
Need I remind you that only blocking is an admin action? Need I also
remind you that the thrust of Durova's investigation appears to have
been that !! was the reincarnation of a previous experienced editor;
which, of course, was quite true?
You have completely ignored the tone of the "report", the clear
statement that the 'evidence' is a demonstration not merely that !! is
a returning editor, but that !! is one of 'them' who share information
from a 'playbook' on how to disrupt WP. I can only assume you have
either not yet read it, or that you have read it and are still unable
to see that most people who read it more than cursorily will
understand that the clear implication is that !! is blockworthy.
Indeed, if you have read it carefully, and you do not see it, and you
still do not see it even after it has been pointed out to you, as I
have once already, I'm afraid I must once again question your
judgment.
RR