On Nov 30, 2007 1:34 AM, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:27:11 +0000, "Sam Blacketer" sam.blacketer@googlemail.com wrote:
The responses I did receive ranged from positive to enthusiastic. I'm certain we all would have changed our minds immediately if that key information had been available to us.
And to be clear here, what they agreed with was that yes, this undoubtedly was indicative of a returning user. Which, as we know, is precisely the case.
Guy (JzG)
How do you know that that was what they agreed with? Have you seen their personal communication on this subject with Durova? And if they read that 'evidence' and wrote enthusiastically to Durova "yes, definitely a WR troll! Good catch!", I'd like to know who these people are so I can examine their future admin actions a little more closely. If they read that 'evidence' and wrote to Durova "definitely a returning user! you're quite right!" and didnt say "of course, many people return, and there's zero evidence that this person's an actual troll account", I'd think there are a few problems with their behaviour then too. Can anyone say, having read that 'evidence', as I have again just now, that those concerns are unreasonable? RR