On Nov 30, 2007 1:34 AM, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:27:11 +0000, "Sam
Blacketer"
<sam.blacketer(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
The responses I did receive ranged from positive
to enthusiastic. I'm
certain we all would have changed our minds immediately if that key
information had been available to us.
And to be clear here, what they agreed with was that yes, this
undoubtedly was indicative of a returning user. Which, as we know,
is precisely the case.
Guy (JzG)
How do you know that that was what they agreed with? Have you seen
their personal communication on this subject with Durova?
And if they read that 'evidence' and wrote enthusiastically to Durova
"yes, definitely a WR troll! Good catch!", I'd like to know who these
people are so I can examine their future admin actions a little more
closely.
If they read that 'evidence' and wrote to Durova "definitely a
returning user! you're quite right!" and didnt say "of course, many
people return, and there's zero evidence that this person's an actual
troll account", I'd think there are a few problems with their
behaviour then too.
Can anyone say, having read that 'evidence', as I have again just now,
that those concerns are unreasonable?
RR