On 28/11/2007, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/11/2007, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
If an admin refuses to publicly reveal the reasons for blocking someone, one alternative is to reveal them to the Arbitration Committee, which she did.
Can you show that there is community consensus in support of this power grab?
It's the way things have run for a while now. Your use of "power grab" doesn't make sense here - the ArbCom is a scaling of Jimbo, who used to deal with difficult cases all on his own.
- d.